Flock’s founder and CEO, Garrett Langley, argues that the benefits of surveillance technology outweigh the risks. Speaking at TechCrunch Disrupt 2026, he maintained that if we want to reduce crime, we must accept greater surveillance, even if it means sacrificing privacy.

Despite backlash, which led to cancelled contracts and layoffs, Langley dismissed concerns, citing anecdotal evidence of criminal cases solved by Flock’s technology. He likened the situation to the development of driverless cars, asserting that just as we accept minor accidents, we should adapt to the potential downsides of surveillance.

Langley emphasized that Flock is not perfect and is open to recommendations from city leaders. However, he insisted on minimizing mandated features, suggesting that the ethical responsibility of using the technology lies with others. In response to critics, he defended Flock against claims of misinformation and stressed that technology should be judged on its progress rather than perfection.

Langley positioned Flock as a solution for reduced police staffing, but when questioned about potential abuses, he offered vague, unsatisfactory answers. His stance suggests that the company is willing to accept public criticism in the name of achieving a better society, even if it means compromising on privacy.