The Manhattan Institute, a right-wing think tank with a storied history in promoting zero-tolerance policing and attacks on diversity programs, has now set its sights on redefining minor protest-related crimes as ‘civil terrorism’. In states like Utah and Arizona, the institute’s push is gaining traction, turning peaceful acts of civil disobedience into felonies.

The theory, championed by legal policy fellow Tal Fortgang, suggests that non-violent actions during protests, such as blocking a road or trespassing, constitute ‘civil terrorism’. This framing seeks to equate these activities with more serious crimes and potentially disrupt the voices of those advocating for social change. Critics argue that this is part of a broader effort by the Trump administration to curtail left-wing activism.

In Utah, HB 331 was swiftly passed, while in Arizona, similar legislation awaits approval. The proposed laws not only increase penalties but also ban protesters from wearing masks, raising concerns about civil liberties and overreach. Senator Catherine Miranda of Arizona has spoken out against these measures, viewing them as an attack on first amendment rights.

This push by the Manhattan Institute reflects a troubling trend where peaceful dissent is increasingly criminalized. As states like Utah and Arizona consider these bills, it’s crucial to question whether such legislation truly serves the public interest or merely stifles free speech in the name of security.